TRANSLATE THIS SITE
Help support the Book Arts Web
All volumes and a complete index online!
ARCHIVE (7/2009 -)
- Full FAQ
with detailed instructions
- Put ALL commands in body of message and send to: email@example.com
- To Subscribe send:
subscribe Book_Arts-L "Your full real name"
Leave out the "" . All subscription requests must include
the full real name or they will not be approved by the moderator.
- To post a message send to: Book_Arts-L@listserv.syr.edu
- For daily digest: set Book_Arts-L mail digest
- To unsubscribe: unsubscribe Book_Arts-L
Bringing us together / Getting us out
The past five years have seen an explosion in the use of the Internet by book
artists both as a tool for communication and as a means of publicizing
their work. Not quite as rapidly, but steadily nevertheless some formerly
traditional book artists have left the confines and limitations of hot
type on damp paper to explore the creation of "books" which
can only exist in digital form. In this presentation, I will explore how
both book artists and the book arts represent themselves using digital
media and what I see as some of the implications for the ways in which
they have traditionally communicated, learned, and worked. This will be
based in large part on my experiences as a binder/conservator, listowner
of Book_Arts-L, and webmaster of the
Book Arts Web.
Until June of 1994, the only communications mechanism for book artists other
than traditional media was the ConsDist list founded by Walter Henry in 1991.
While this was geared first and foremost to conservators, most in the library
field, it did see a number of queries by book artists (binders) who were looking
for technical information. It was, however, a start, and this medium of email
was still in its infancy, certainly outside of academic circles. Having worked
in and been a part of the book arts communities in Chicago and New England, I
moved to centrally isolated Ithaca, NY, where I was rare books conservator at
Cornell. Compared to my past haunts, CNY was a very barren and remote place to
practice the book arts, especially since I had enjoyed regular interaction with
other book artists to exchange ideas and learn from each other. Attempts were
made to form a loose regional group with a newsletter, but this never succeeded
in building the active critical mass required for success. Being in an academic
setting email, became much more a part of my life and I began to explore
listservs and gopher, the precursor to the web. At about this same time in early
'93 Typo-L was founded, a list
which continues to serve the typographic community. For much of its first year,
however, that list was unusually quiet, with numerous "is anyone else out
there" messages. I also happened to be unaware of its existence.
When I founded Book_Arts-L in June of
1994 it was announced on ConsDist and Exlibris, a list for rare book librarians,
and I waited to see what would happen. Walter Henry, who knew about the
list, offered to host its archives on his server CoOL
in a gopher, web accessible format. I knew about some of the technicalities,
but was clueless about what I was getting myself into to. Needless to
say, I said yes. The subscriber list grew slowly, but steadily, as did
participation, and by the end of that first year there were about 400
subscribers with as many postings. Initially, I found myself "hand-holding"
people as they attempted to subscribe and learn to use listserv and email.
To some extent this continues to happen, though much more infrequently.
Mac users had the greatest number of difficulties as they were not used
to issuing command-line commands, followed quickly by the AOL subscribers.
With time that has improved dramatically. Managing 1200+ can be a chore,
but also a great deal of fun as one gets to know people all over the world,
all tied together by a common interest.
Not content to simply discuss technical matters, within weeks we were
debating the essence of the book, a topic which would reoccur periodically
and explode in the Spring of this year. An informal recent survey has
found that there are now at least 5 listservs for book-art-related topics
and Book_Arts-L) with a total subscriber
base of at least 2500 world wide, not including those on multiple lists.
The archives of these lists are available via the Web. While there is
quite a bit of dead-wood in these archives such as the "me too"
replies to something or other, these archives have nevertheless become
a great repository of collective experience and knowledge about such arcane
topics as reconditioning a press, finding a particular supplier, using
materials, and how to practice the craft. Quality of postings varies greatly,
determined by the expertise of the poster, but that serves an educational
function as well. We all learn best from our own or other's experiences.
As indicated by their names, these listservs all serve a distinct constituency
and are quite active. With many subscribed to multiple lists, it is not
uncommon for the same theme to appear at the same time on numerous lists
or for topic to begin on one list, be cross-posted and picked up by another,
with each list putting it's own distinct stamp on the discussion. On Book_Arts-L,
a discussion began with an "innocently simple" question looking
for a definition of "artist's book," which printed
out is 89 pages. These discussions travelled a very circuitous route,
becoming "what is art," the difference between "art and
craft," "craft," training, technical competence... A similar
discussion recently occurred on the calligraphy list beginning with a
question using teaching materials and judging the quality of work vs consumer
expectations. Most threads, however, are not as involved and revolve around
relatively simple queries and announcements. The challenge is in predicting
which will grow into something bigger. Most subscribers are genuinely
helpful or want to be, but as in society as a whole we have all types,
so personalities and their expectations can get tricky. Feelings and expression
there-of can become a trap for those new to the net and not familiar with
communication habits. "Netiquette" postings help, but not always.
Generally everyone is civil, though sometimes it becomes too mushy and
effusive (with thanks) for my taste. When things get out of hand, which
is rare, but does happen, the listowner may have to remind subscribers
that it is not a democracy or even anarchy, but a benign dictatorship.
Usually an offline message works, but on occasion people have had to be
silenced or removed. It is very difficult to keep someone who really wants
to be on a list off, but generally they have cooled off or the topic has
changed so everything works out.
When CoOL became a website, I was able to create a "page" for
archive. A that point I also asked about establishing a site for the
Guild of Book Workers,
of which I was Exhibitions Chair and Newsletter production editor at the
time. With Walter's consent, I began to learn HTML, lifting code from
pages I liked and exploring this new medium for what else it had to offer
relating to the book arts. Always a pioneer, Richard
Minsky established one of the first sites dedicated to the book as
art. Even though it was designed to show (yes, this was now possible),
promote, and sell, his work, Richard also took the time to explain his
work and the philosophy behind it.
Upon my arrival at Syracuse, less than a year after starting the list,
I established my own presence on the Web (The
Book Arts Web), which included along with the usual self promotion
a list of 10 links. These would continue to grow exponentially year after
year as did postings to the list. Currently there are at least 300+ related
websites. These themselves can be loosely broken down into the following
categories: organizational (GBW,
CBBAG...); Academic programs; independent
centers; individuals; small presses; businesses; meta- sites. Numerous
exhibits, organized by libraries, organizations, and programs have also
been mounted on the web. On my site, I chose
to segregate these to make it easier for someone just wanting to see illustrative
examples. Online book arts exhibitions are generally mounted by a library,
usually by special collections (University
of Iowa - Tiny Tomes), by a book arts organization such as GBW
or CBBAG, or by an art/design school
or program such as the exhibition of Czech
publishers bindings at Art Center College of Design in Pasadena, CA.
Themes for these exhibitions range from historical bindings/editions such
as the Aldine books at Brigham
Young University, to fore-edge paintings, artists books, and occasionally
prints, though these are usually shown in a more historical context.
Exhibitions can serve a variety of purposes such as promoting holdings
or new acquisitions, or they are used to promote an event, such as the
25th anniversary of the Silver
Buckle Press. Unfortunately, while the exhibitions tend to show high
caliber work, the effort to publicize them is often not impressive. One
announcement on a listserv is common, but that's usually where it ends,
with the exhibits living online for some time and then perhaps disappearing.
In the case of GBW and
CBBAG, the online exhibits are meant
to serve as a vehicle for generating interest in the organization and
actually selling the print catalog. Paper
Bound, the first online exhibition by a book arts organization
(GBW), was followed this year by CBBAG's Art
of the Book '97 and last month by the Guild's Abecedarium.
While showcasing a particular group's work, these sites also serve as
vehicles for catalog sales. As an example, 1/5th (100+) of Paper Bound's
catalogs were sold via the online exhibit before the
exhibition opened or the catalog appeared in print. While some may feel
that having an exhibit online can hurt sales, I feel the opposite is true
because it can whet (or dampen) the public's appetite, making one desire
the more permanent print edition. The great unknown in this medium is
longevity, so there should be at least a minimal version in print, such
as a checklist.
Sites appear and disappear without notice, occasionally to be missed. As the
book goes digital this will become an increasing problem as libraries and
collectors will need to ensure that the work will be able to live on beyond the
current medium. The artists who conceive these works will also have to be aware
of this and work towards ensuring that their work will exist in the future.
Failure to do so will make the brittle book problem appear laughable. At least
those books can still be read, even if crumbling in the process.
Many book-arts-related organizations worldwide have established a presence
for themselves on the Web, some more extensive (CBBAG
& GBW) than others.
Typically, these sites will include membership information, a collection
of links, newsletters (or excerpts) and, more recently, online versions
of exhibition catalogs. Besides promoting the groups, this combination
of content helps make the site a resource and source of information, which
while often not as current or spontaneous as postings on listservs, is
often more carefully thought out and reliable. GBW and CBBAG are the most
Web active of the groups and present the most content. In addition to
two online exhibition catalogs, the Guild also has its "Study
Opportunities List" online as well as the full text of its Newsletters
going back to 1994. Others such as the Society
of Bookbinders or the Victorian
Bookbinder's Guild, have a minimal presence with some excerpts from
their Newsletters and some visuals. Contact information is always present.
The academic MFA in bookarts program sites are led by the University
of Alabama, University of Idaho, and University
of Iowa, with other programs existing more at a departmental level
such as those at the University
of Delaware and Loyola
College in Baltimore. While often being smaller, these departmental
sites nevertheless provide a strong showcase for student and faculty work
and are often of a less purely informational or promotional nature. These
sites also tend to push the definition of the book further, even into
the realm of the digital, by using and experimenting with the computer
and other media. The driver of this process is generally an individual
faculty members within the department. The larger "program"
sites tend to provide less original creative content and more background
about the programs themselves. The University of Idaho,
one of the first on the Web, was different in that it actively sought
to build up a virtual gallery both onsite and through offsite links. That
site, however, has become stagnat because the creator has left. Other
program sites function as part of a library or special collections such
as the Silver Buckle
Press site here at the University of Wisconsin. Additionally there
are sites representing the interest and activities of organizations and
groups promoting interest in scholarly historical or artistic facets of
the book arts.
The independent centers such as Center
for Book Arts, Women's Studio
Workshop, San Francisco Center for
the Book, Pyramid
Atlantic have for the most part limited their presence to the promotion
of workshops, exhibits, and other programs. While not expansive in their
visual offerings, these are perhaps of the greatest importance because
of their promotion of educational opportunities accessible
to anyone, an essential role if the book arts are to grow and gain popular
The largest group on the web is composed of the individual/bindery
pages. This is also where the greatest variety is to be found, especially
among the individuals. Book artists maintaining their own pages use these
to varying degrees. For some, it is a direct marketing tool designed to
help them gain exposure and ultimately sell their work. For others, especially
those that don't derive their sole income from their bookwork, their pages
serve as a digital vanity press. Types of content typically include: "my
books," items for sale (artists books, blank journals, handmade cards...),
"about me," "classes I teach," bibliographies, tutorials,
and other resources. Some, such as Norman
Sasowsky, at the University of Delaware even publish some of their
artist's books online. Of the pages in this group, some are created as
part of a MLS /MFA degree in which the author(s), in this case Emily
Dawson and her colleagues at the UMD, discuss "some of the
possibilities for affecting the perception of text, and present an overview
of graphic text representation in western culture, look at nonlinearity
in literature and the book arts, and share some thoughts about the future
of text and the book in the new electronic age." Related are
articles such as "Through
Light and the Alphabet," an interview with Joanna Drucker which
was published online by Postmodern Culture. Richard
Minsky and Edward Hutchins
also attempt to define "the book" in their way on their pages.
These "intellectually challenging" pages are however the exception
rather than the rule. While not figuratively illustrating bookwork, these
types of pages are instrumental in helping us think about and define the
The trade / hand-bindery pages represent a small but growing segment
on the Web and are for the most part purely informational, with contact
information, descriptions of work, and perhaps pricing. Some, but not
many illustrate treatments or examples of work. The remaining book arts
such as calligraphy, letterpress
/ printmaking, papermaking and decorated
papers are fairly even in their numbers, with the last two being the
smallest group. Not surprisingly digital type "foundries" are
very well represented. A small number of fine presses are also represented,
among them Nexus, Granary,
Big Bridge (publishes work of Andrew
Hoyem, Peter Koch among others), and some
in the UK.
How successful are these sites in promoting book artists and related businesses?
The results vary widely. A "catalog of artists books" was compiled
which features the work of numerous practicing book artists (all list
subscribers). The work on this list varies widely and was limited to artists
books / edition binding, excluding more mundane journals. This catalog
has been visited 2000+ times since being initially compiled in April of
this year. Recently a subscriber asked if anyone had any success with
sales. The results were rather disappointing. Several reported some interest,
but no sales. Pat Baldwin,
a book artist in AZ reported some sales, but said she also does her own
mailings and all refer back to her page, so attribution would be difficult.
Others reported that they had almost no nibbles of any kind from their
pages. Disappointing results, but not completely unexpected, especially
when one considers that for the most part we end up promoting ourselves
to our peers. The results by businesses were not much better, but most
commented that not having a page up was worse than having one with few
hits. One likened it to advertising in the Yellow Pages. If one is familiar
with the field and some of the names, it is possible to find the information
one is looking for. The difficulty becomes weeding through the number
of "hits," especially since the archives of all the lists are
indexed by the search engines as well.
Regardless of it how it is used, listserv or web, the Internet has enabled
any with a computer to broadcast his/her presence on a heretofore unimaginable
scale at a very low cost. Whereas, in the past, only a relatively small
"elite" number of artists would have been able to gain publicity
on a wide scale through published exhibition or gallery catalogs and lists
of these, today all that is needed is an Internet account with Web space,
something most service providers now offer. This has been seized upon,
especially by the relatively new adherents to the book arts, in some sense
creating a distorted picture of the book arts as a whole, one more basic
and one-dimensional than really exists. Along with images of book work,
there are also an increasing number of tutorials
which describe the basic forms of concertina, single section, Japanese,
or some other "funky-foldy" structure. The more traditional/complex
structures are, with few exceptions, simply not present. When one looks
at the current crop of binding manuals, the structures being taught and
produced in book oriented classes or workshops, and even major national
exhibitions one sees the same picture. Why is this?
With increasingly few exceptions "traditional" book structures,
such as those used in fine bindings, are not being taught anymore and in some
cases being dismissed as irrelevant or "old fashioned." This same
pattern is also reflected in listserv discussions. The most enthusiastic and
active participants are those beginners who are looking for inspiration and
guidance, or just some form of confirmation that they are on the right path.
Most answers seem to come from that same group, with the more experienced,
professional, binders and book artists only jumping in when things become
frightening. As listowner, I know who is subscribed. There are far more
experienced/established artists, binders, conservators among those subscribed
than one would ever guess. Most chose to be "lurkers" for whatever
reason. I believe that this is typical of most lists. Occasionally these
"experts" will also lament the nature of the list discussions, usually
offline, though there have been the occasion slip-ups with the "reply
key" resulting in (usually) short flame wars. On the whole however, the
arts/crafts related lists are very civil, which is not to say we don't get
passionate on occasion. Of the lists in existence, the letterpress and
printmaking lists are the most focused. A possible reason for this could be the
much higher initial investment in equipment and training needed which tends to
weed out the more casual "crafter" wanting to learn about books.
Why do book artists become involved in this mode of communication anyway?
One, if not the greatest, reason is that it helps bring people with like
interests together, no matter how remote and isolated they may be in real life.
Email and listservs have been described by Susan Kapuscinski Gaylord as
"the great social equalizer, a place where students or aspiring artists can
rub elbows and build networks, even long-term relationships with others like
themselves but also with the more established elements including instructors,
gallery reps, and potential collectors in a virtual community which would take
years to develop on one's own using traditional means." As we all work on
our own projects, in our own corners of the world, (and this medium really does
bring the world together), we are able to gather information from a range of
sources which would be impossible to assemble elsewhere. At times these come in
with dizzying speed and verge on becoming real time discussions, presenting new
and different viewpoints and making us pause to think and reexamine our work.
These are the digital medium's strengths.
With all this instant gratification we must keep in mind that the computer
and Internet are but tools to help us communicate, a means to an end, but they
shouldn't be the end themselves. We discuss the book arts as if they were
something very remote and something from the distant past. The computer has
enable us to do ourselves what used to be a highly skilled trade or craft such
as typesetting, typographic design, and illustration. We can print multiple
colors in a single pass, layout complete pages with a multitude of fonts, insert
illustrations, and manipulate all with amazing ease. We have achieved the
ability to become complete micro-publishers, whether in print or on-screen. At
the same time, while the technology is a great enabler, we seem to be losing
something in the process, our grasp of the fundamentals and theory behind the
process and how things fit together. We have also come to expect quick and easy
answers to our problems which makes some believe that one can learn a craft
online or in a weekend workshop. This reminds me of an incident when I was
working in Chicago with William Minter and we were looking for an
"apprentice." Someone walked into the shop and said they wanted to
dedicate themselves to the bookarts. We were looking for a two year commitment
which astounded this person. Their response, "I would think this is
something one can easily learn in a month or so..." Oh well.
Finally, as our online lives have become a series of hyperlinks and emails,
the "book" is losing its "bookness"
and heading into the realm of the purely digital by taking advantage of
the creative possibilities made possible by hypertext and the web. Recent
examples include Janet Maher's Alphabet
and Jennifer Vignone's Keelhaul.
Now the reader can shape a story which could have any multitude of endings
all influenced by how the reader interacts with the text.We have dramatically
changed our "reading mode," and not just with "artist's
books." The print media have published numerous reports about how
the book is going purely
digital and the most recent issue of Biblio
writing about John
Warnock (CEO, Adobe) and his bibliophilic habits, also mentions his
involvement with Octavo, a subsidiary,
which is working on digitizing and publishing at a very low cost many
of the classic texts of the ages in PDF format. No longer are we bound
to the author's/artist's structure for the text. This week in Salon
Magazine there was also an article on the issuance of Griffin
and Sabine as interactive CD-ROM. When Book_Arts-L began, Gary
Frost (from Craig Jensen's email), in one of the list's first messages,
remarked that the book arts should not be subjected to electronic discussion.
Perhaps it is the only field that should not traffic in disembodied text
(or ugly printouts). While I believe that his view point was / is
somewhat extreme, I also believe there is some validity to it, even though
I am perhaps one of the greatest offenders. It is clear that we cannot
stop this transformation (or progression) of the book, nor is it neccesarily
desireable that we do so. We, as book artists, should not avoid using
this medium though. What I fear, however, is that we are at risk of losing
touch with our roots in the book arts as we become seduced by the power
of these new technologies. Let us use them to communicate with oneanother,
to exchange ideas and techniques, as a tool to assist with design,
to make others aware of our art and craft and to raise the publics expectations
by showing our work at the highest levels of art and craft. These are
this technologies greatest strength.
Presented by Peter D. Verheyen ©
20 November, 1998
NOTE: Where possible, links have been updated over time with those no
longer functioning as part of the artifact.